<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>inside aebrahim's head &#187; time capsule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ebrahim.org/tag/time-capsule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ebrahim.org</link>
	<description>Ali Ebrahim on web standards, software developement, technology, politics and law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Apple Wireless Friendly?</title>
		<link>http://blog.ebrahim.org/2008/05/11/is-apple-wireless-friendly/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ebrahim.org/2008/05/11/is-apple-wireless-friendly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aebrahim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ebrahim.org/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the great success of the iPhone and iPod Touch, you&#8217;d think Apple would be sitting pretty as the king of wireless networking. Plus, Apple has a reputation for making relatively complicated tasks more user friendly by having more streamlined &#8230; <a href="http://blog.ebrahim.org/2008/05/11/is-apple-wireless-friendly/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the great success of the iPhone and iPod Touch, you&#8217;d think Apple would be sitting pretty as the king of wireless networking. Plus, Apple has a reputation for making relatively complicated tasks more user friendly by having more streamlined UI than the competition.</p>
<p>However, my experience with Apple&#8217;s networking products has been pretty disappointing. Not because they don&#8217;t work well (they do), but because they are the most confusing and user-unfriendly wifi products I have used, <em>ever</em>.</p>
<p>My first foray into Apple&#8217;s wifi products was the <a href="http://www.apple.com/timecapsule/">Time Capsule</a>. The idea behind this is excellent, to have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Attached_Storage">NAS</a> built into the router so that backup for Mac users is painless by just having to flip a switch to turn <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html">Time Machine</a> on. Whether the user is plugged in or not, this still works behind the scenes, eliminating the biggest barrier to having regular users back up.</p>
<p>The idea is great; the implementation, well, not so smooth. Out of the box, the Time Capsule seemed to work okay, until I tried connecting via wifi. This didn&#8217;t work at all, no matter what I did. It would connect, and then drop, and I&#8217;d then have to reset the router and then rinse, repeat, ad infinitum. I found others on forums had the same problems, with no solution. In the end, this magically started working a few weeks later with a firmware update to 7.3.1. That&#8217;s nice, but you&#8217;d think that basic wireless connectivity would have been better tested before release.</p>
<p>Today I picked up an <a href="http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/">Airport Express</a> so that I could extend the range of the network to cover our entire apartment. This device also shipped with what I would consider broken firmware, and I had to upgrade to 7.3.1 before it would do anything useful. It&#8217;s now working okay (I think), but only after about an hour of tinkering.</p>
<p>My main beef with Apple is that the documentation is so simple. When it works, it works great. When it doesn&#8217;t work, you just have to scratch your head and go to Google, because God forbid Apple have any useful troubleshooting resources online to scare the non-tech saavy users away.</p>
<p>One point which I find thoroughly confusing is that the Airport Express has an option to either participate in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Distribution_System">WDS</a> or to &#8220;Extend wireless network&#8221;. Both of these options appear to be variations of the same thing, but I can&#8217;t figure out what the difference is between the two of them. A lot of people <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=wds+network+extend">are asking the same question</a>.</p>
<p>After a lot of searching, I still don&#8217;t know what the difference is, except that <em>maybe</em> the option to &#8220;Extend wireless network&#8221; is sort of like WDS on steroids. However, I have no idea and there&#8217;s no information on this that I can find. Apple doesn&#8217;t explain this anywhere either, even though both the options are obviously different.</p>
<p>The most important question I have which is as yet unanswered is whether either of the two options supports seamless handover of clients between different access points on the same network.</p>
<p>Long story short: Apple wifi products work great once they&#8217;re configured. Good luck trying to get them configured correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ebrahim.org/2008/05/11/is-apple-wireless-friendly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

